| cdf.test.mppm {spatstat} | R Documentation |
Performs a spatial distribution test of a Poisson point process model fitted to multiple spatial point patterns. The test compares the observed and predicted distributions of the values of a spatial covariate, using either the Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Cramer-von Mises or Anderson-Darling test of goodness-of-fit.
## S3 method for class 'mppm'
cdf.test(model, covariate, test=c("ks", "cvm", "ad"), ...,
verbose=TRUE, interpolate=FALSE, fast=TRUE, jitter=TRUE)
model |
An object of class |
covariate |
The spatial covariate on which the test will be based.
A function, a pixel image, a list of functions, a list of pixel
images, a hyperframe, or a character string containing the name
of one of the covariates in |
test |
Character string identifying the test to be performed:
|
... |
Arguments passed to |
verbose |
Logical flag indicating whether to print progress reports. |
interpolate |
Logical flag indicating whether to interpolate between pixel values when codecovariate is a pixel image. See Details. |
fast |
Logical flag. If |
jitter |
Logical flag. If |
This function is a method for the generic function
cdf.test for the class mppm.
This function performs a goodness-of-fit test of a point process model that has been fitted to multiple point patterns. The observed distribution of the values of a spatial covariate at the data points, and the predicted distribution of the same values under the model, are compared using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test.
The argument model should be a fitted point process model
fitted to multiple point patterns
(object of class "mppm"). It should be a Poisson point process.
The argument covariate contains the values of a spatial
function. It can be
a function(x,y)
a pixel image (object of class "im"
a list of function(x,y), one for each point pattern
a list of pixel images, one for each point pattern
a hyperframe (see hyperframe)
of which the first
column will be taken as containing the covariate
a character string giving the name of one of the covariates
in model.
If covariate is an image, it should have numeric values,
and its domain should cover the observation window of the
model. If covariate is a function, it should expect
two arguments x and y which are vectors of coordinates,
and it should return a numeric vector of the same length
as x and y.
First the original data point pattern is extracted from model.
The values of the covariate at these data points are
collected.
The predicted distribution of the values of the covariate
under the fitted model is computed as follows.
The values of the covariate at all locations in the
observation window are evaluated,
weighted according to the point process intensity of the fitted model,
and compiled into a cumulative distribution function F using
ewcdf.
The probability integral transformation is then applied:
the values of the covariate at the original data points
are transformed by the predicted cumulative distribution function
F into numbers between 0 and 1. If the model is correct,
these numbers are i.i.d. uniform random numbers.
A goodness-of-fit test of the uniform distribution is applied
to these numbers using ks.test,
cvm.test or ad.test.
This test was apparently first described (in the context of spatial data, and for Kolmogorov-Smirnov) by Berman (1986). See also Baddeley et al (2005).
The argument interpolate determines
how pixel values will be handled when codecovariate is a pixel image.
The value of the covariate at a data point is obtained
by looking up the value of the nearest pixel if
interpolate=FALSE, or by linearly interpolating
between the values of the four nearest pixels
if interpolate=TRUE. Linear interpolation is slower,
but is sometimes necessary to avoid tied values of the covariate
arising when the pixel grid is coarse.
An object of class "cdftest" and "htest"
containing the results of the
test. See cdf.test for details.
Adrian Baddeley adrian.baddeley@uwa.edu.au http://www.maths.uwa.edu.au/~adrian/ and Rolf Turner rolf@math.unb.ca http://www.math.unb.ca/~rolf
Baddeley, A., Turner, R., Moller, J. and Hazelton, M. (2005) Residual analysis for spatial point processes. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 67, 617–666.
Berman, M. (1986) Testing for spatial association between a point process and another stochastic process. Applied Statistics 35, 54–62.
# three i.i.d. realisations of nonuniform Poisson process
lambda <- as.im(function(x,y) { 300 * exp(x) }, square(1))
dat <- hyperframe(X=list(rpoispp(lambda), rpoispp(lambda), rpoispp(lambda)))
# fit uniform Poisson process
fit0 <- mppm(X~1, dat)
# fit correct nonuniform Poisson process
fit1 <- mppm(X~x, dat)
# test covariate = x coordinate
xcoord <- function(x,y) { x }
# test wrong model
cdf.test(fit0, xcoord)
# test right model
cdf.test(fit1, xcoord)